Palavras-chave
Administração de empresas
Teoria dos sistemas
Inovação
Liderança
Tomada de decisões
Como Citar
Resumo
O objetivo é propor um marco teórico integrador que explique a evolução organizacional como um processo dinâmico em espiral. A proposta não reúne três fatores justapostos: ela os articula em uma cadeia, na qual a ação deliberada produz a experiência a partir da qual se aprende, a aprendizagem acumulativa renova as razões que sustentam o compromisso organizacional e esse compromisso define a intencionalidade da ação com a qual se inicia o ciclo seguinte. Essa cadeia, e não a soma de seus componentes, orienta a trajetória ascendente ou descendente do ciclo evolutivo. Foi elaborado um artigo de reflexão teórica por meio de uma revisão integrativa da literatura com raciocínio abduativo, com base em um corpus de 32 fontes localizadas no Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO e Google Acadêmico; 17 delas publicadas entre 2020 e 2026. As categorias foram obtidas por codificação temática e submetidas a testes de coerência interna e de pertinência externa. Como resultado, propõe-se o modelo da espiral de maturidade organizacional, com cinco níveis de desenvolvimento: sobrevivência (N1), estabilidade (N2), otimização (N3), expansão (N4) e transcendência (N5). Cada nível é definido pelo estado simultâneo dos três vetores, com indicadores observáveis e condições de ascensão e declínio. Conclui-se que a espiral descreve, em termos estruturais e ainda sem validação empírica, como as organizações acumulam ou desperdiçam capacidade adaptativa: como os vetores formam uma cadeia, a desconexão de qualquer um deles é suficiente para reverter a trajetória ascendente. A formulação situa-se no nível organizacional.
Referências
Alonazi, W. B. (2021). Building learning organizational culture during COVID-19 outbreak: a national study. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 422. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06454-9
Anand, A. y Brix, J. (2022). The learning organization and organizational learning in the public sector: a review and research agenda. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 29(2), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2021-0061
Argote, L., Lee, S. y Park, J. (2021). Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions. Management Science, 67(9), 5399-5429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
Argyris, C. y Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
Avby, G. (2022). An integrative learning approach: Combining improvement methods and ambidexterity. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 29(4), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-10-2021-0127
Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Wiley.
Edmondson, A. C. y Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
Evenseth, L. L., Sydnes, M. y Gausdal, A. H. (2022). Building Organizational Resilience Through Organizational Learning: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 837386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.837386
Faller, P., Lundgren, H. y Marsick, V. J. (2020). Overview: Why and How Does Reflection Matter in Workplace Learning? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(3), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422320927295
Hamel, G. y Zanini, M. (2020). Humanocracy: Creating Organizations as Amazing as the People Inside Them. Harvard Business Review Press.
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A. y Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and The World. Harvard Business Press.
Hughes, M. (2011). Do 70 Per Cent of All Organizational Change Initiatives Really Fail? Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.630506
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
Lawrence, T. B., Mauws, M. K., Dyck, B. y Kleysen, R. F. (2005). The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integrating Power into the 4I Framework. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281451
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Lichtenstein, B. B. (2014). Generative Emergence: A New Discipline of Organizational, Entrepreneurial, and Social Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Mack, O. y Khare, A. (2016). Perspectives on a VUCA world. En O. Mack, A. Khare, A. Krämer y T. Burgartz (Eds.), Managing in a VUCA world (pp. 3-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0_1
Meyer, J. P. y Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Mousa, M., Abdelgaffar, H. A., Chaouali, W. y Aboramadan, M. (2020). Organizational learning, organizational resilience and the mediating role of multi-stakeholder networks. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(3), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-05-2019-0057
Nonaka, I. y Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Örtenblad, A. (2020). Editorial. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 27(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2020-243
Peschl, M. F. (2023). Learning from the future as a novel paradigm for integrating organizational learning and innovation. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 30(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2021-0018
Reese, S. (2020). Reflecting on impacts of Peter Senge’s Fifth Discipline on learning organizations. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 27(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2020-244
Scharmer, C. O. (2022). Theory U: Leading From the Future as it Emerges (3.ª ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
Senge, P. M. (2023). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization (ed. rev.). Currency.
Stacey, R. D. (2020). The chaos frontier: Creative strategic control for business. Routledge.
Törmänen, J., Hämäläinen, R. P. y Saarinen, E. (2022). On the systems intelligence of a learning organization: Introducing a new measure. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(3), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21455
Uhl-Bien, M. y Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. y McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Vince, R. y Saleem, T. (2004). The Impact of Caution and Blame on Organizational Learning. Management Learning, 35(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604043022
Watkinson, M. y Konkoly, C. (2023). Dominar la incertidumbre: Cómo los grandes emprendedores y líderes empresariales prosperan en un mundo impredecible. Empresa Activa.
Weick, K. E. y Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational Change and Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Ernesto Alfredo Martínez Acosta