The Marginalisation of Women in the History of Science: Enabling Female Participation and Visibility in the Scientific Community
PDF (Spanish)
EPUB (Spanish)

Keywords

Best practices
Gender inequality
Structural barriers and trust-building
Women in science STEM
Scientific leadership
Inclusive research spaces

How to Cite

Trusilewicz, L. N. (2025). The Marginalisation of Women in the History of Science: Enabling Female Participation and Visibility in the Scientific Community. Investigaciones Latinoamericanas En Ingeniería Y Arquitectura, (2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.51378/ilia.vi2.9847

Abstract

Gender inequality in science remains a persistent phenomenon with deep historical roots and continues to be shaped by structural barriers that limit women’s participation, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, but also in other regions of the world. Throughout the centuries, women have been marginalised, rendered invisible, and systematically excluded from scientific production, despite their valuable contributions. According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (UN ECLAC) and the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) (2024) [1, 2], this inequality is sustained by four structural knots: socioeconomic inequality and poverty, the sexual division of labour, the concentration of power, and patriarchal cultural norms. These factors have shaped and reinforced women’s exclusion from decision making and leadership spaces, perpetuating the dominance of “boys’ clubs” in science. Intergenerational belonging to these closed structures has consolidated a distorted perception of intellectual potential, where talent and capability have been wrongly associated with gender rather than merit. In light of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Regional Gender Agenda in Latin America and the Caribbean (Gender Indicators 2023), this presentation will examine the transformation of the scientific community into a space that is psychologically and emotionally healthier, as well as more inclusive and diverse for today’s and tomorrow’s global scientific diaspora.

PDF (Spanish)
EPUB (Spanish)

References

REFERENCIAS CEPAL y ONU Mujeres, Los nudos críticos de la desigualdad de género en América Latina y el Caribe. Avances y desafíos para la autonomía de las mujeres. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, 2024.

ONU Mujeres, Indicadores de Género en América Latina y el Caribe 2023. Santiago de Chile: ONU Mujeres, 2024.

Schiebinger, L. (2001). Has feminism changed science? Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674005440.

Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285482

Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-80141880-1.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Trusilewicz, L. N., Stroobants, K., McCashin, D., Ponté, J., Herr, V. I. (2020) Structural violence and harassment within the scientific environment. Panel session presented at the MCAA Virtual Conference – Research & Democracy, organized by the Marie Curie Alumni Association (MCAA), Policy Working Group and Responsible Research Environment Task Force, Brussels, Belgium, Nov. 7, 2020. https://youtu.be/i-Lxxx_pF8s?si=Zvs8PLweWs4sA8_A

Trusilewicz, L. N. Stroobants, K., Arroyo López, C., McCashin, D. (2022). Zero tolerance for bullying in practise through the redefinition of success criteria in science. Poster presented at the EuroScience Open Forum (ESOF2022), MCAA Policy Working Group, Responsible Research Environments Task Force, Poster P71 – Sustainable Academic Careers, Leiden, Netherlands, July 15, 2022.

Benschop, Y. (2009). The micro-politics of gendering in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(2), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00438.x

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977

Rossiter, M. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-2443-5.

UNESCO (2017) Cracking the Code: Girls’ and Women’s Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Paris.

Río Lozano, M. (2014). Desigualdades de género en el cuidado informal y su impacto diferencial sobre la salud de las mujeres y los hombres (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/34181/24032980.pdf

Cordero, M. (2022). Género y poder en la ciencia: el fenómeno del club de chicos. Rev. Iberoam. Cienc. Tecnol. Soc., vol. 17, no. 49, pp. 53–74.

Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University ISBN 978-0-8223-6319-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373377

Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07342-2.

Vesalius, A. (1543). De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basilea: Johannes Oporinus

O’Connell HE, Hutson JM, Anderson CR, Plenter RJ. Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. J Urol. 1998 Jun;159(6):1892-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63188-4. PMID: 9598482.

Morgan, S. (2013). Sexism and anatomy, as discerned in textbooks and as portrayed in medical sources. AMA Journal of Ethics, 15(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12070

Blechner, M. J. (2017). The clitoris: Anatomical and psychological issues. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 18(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2017.1349509

Al Hamid A, Beckett R, Wilson M, Jalal Z, Cheema E, Al-Jumeily Obe D, Coombs T, Ralebitso-Senior K, Assi S. Gender Bias in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54264. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54264. PMID: 38500942; PMCID: PMC10945154.

Sociedad Española de Médicos Generales y de Familia (SEMG). (2025, 12 de junio). El sesgo de género en la atención médica provoca desigualdades en el acceso, calidad y los resultados en la salud de las mujeres [Nota de prensa]. https://www.semg.es/images/2025/noticias/NdP_congreso_SEMG25_20250612_1.pdf

Hooks, B. (2017). El feminismo es para todo el mundo. Traficantes de Sueños. ISBN: 978-84947196-1-5. https://traficantes.net/sites/default/files/pdfs/TDS_map47_hooks_web.pdf

Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press. ISBN 0-89608629-1. https://excoradfeminisms.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/bell_hooks-feminism_is_for_everybody.pdf

Freeman, R. B., Huang, W. (2015). Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1), S289–S318. https://doi.org/10.1086/678973

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158. http://www.jstor.org/stable/189609

Courey, K., Ruffin, M., Hebl, M., Stewart, D., Townsend, M., Seged, L., Williams, J., Patterson, C., Mei, S., King, E. (2022). Gender in Organizations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.862.

García-Calvente, M. del M., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N., Del Río-Lozano, M., Marcos-Marcos, J., Martínez-Morante, E., Maroto-Navarro, G., Mateo-Rodríguez, I., Gil-García, E. (2012). Exhausted women, tough men: A qualitative study on gender differences in health, vulnerability and coping with illness in Spain. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(6), 911-926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01440.x

Staines, G., Tavris, C., Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7(8), 5560

Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., de Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X525280

Derks, B., van Laar, C., Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., Derks, B., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2017). Nothing changes really: Why women who break through the glass ceiling end up reinforcing it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217695551

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., Derks, B. (2020). The Queen Bee phenomenon in academia 15 years after: Does it still exist, and if so, why? British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 694–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12408

Banaji, M. R., Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press. ISBN: 9780553804645

NobelPrize.org, “Gerty Theresa Cori – Facts,” NobelPrize.org, 1947. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1947/cori-gt/facts/

American Chemical Society, “Carl and Gerty Cori and Carbohydrate Metabolism,” ACS National Historic Chemical Landmarks, 2004. https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/carbohydratemetabolism.html

Asociación Interamericana de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental (AIDIS), “Sara Rietti: una pionera de la ingeniería química argentina,” AIDIS Mujeres en STEM, Mar. 2021.

Trimarchi, F., Vitti, P. Gabriella Morreale de Escobar (1930–2017). J Endocrinol Invest 41, 497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0878-0

Wilcox J. The face of women’s health: Helen Rodriguez-Trias. Am J Public Health. 2002 Apr;92(4):566-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.4.566. Erratum in: Am J Public Health 2002 Jun;92(6):894. PMID: 11919054; PMCID: PMC1447119

Encyclopedia Britannica, “Lydia Villa-Komaroff,” Feb. 7, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lydia-Villa-Komaroff

iBiology, “How I Became a Scientist: Lydia Villa-Komaroff,” iBiology Talk. https://www.ibiology.org/profiles/sacnas/

Red de Científicas Mexicanas, “Julieta Fierro Gossman,” Wiki, 2020.

Universidad de Chile. María Teresa Ruiz González – Premio Nacional de Ciencias Exactas. https://uchile.cl/presentacion/historia/grandes-figuras/premios-nacionales/ciencias/maria-teresa-ruiz-gonzalez

United Nations Environment Programme, “Julia Carabias Lillo – Champions of the Earth Laureate 2005,” UNEP, 2005. https://www.unep.org/championsofearth/laureates/2005/julia-carabias-lillo

SENADO DE LA REPÚBLICA (México). Medalla Belisario Domínguez: Julia Carabias Lillo. Senado.gob.mx, 2017.

Universidad de Guanajuato. Dra. Tessy López Goerne: una guerrera que combate enfermedades a través de la ciencia. https://www.ugto.mx/noticias/noticias/8863-dra-tessy-lopez-goerne-unaguerrera-que-combate-enfermedades-a-travesde-la-ciencia;

Lopez-Gorne, T., Padilla-Godinez, F. J., Arevalo, A. Nanomedicina catalítica para heridas crónicas en pacientes diabéticos: fisiología, fisiopatología y una historia de éxito. Mundo nano. 2024, vol.17, n.33, e69817. Epub 26-Nov-2024. ISSN 2448-5691. https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2024.33.69817.

NASA. Diana Trujillo: De Colombia a Marte. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/diana-trujillo-de-colombia-marte/

Criado Pérez, C. (2019). Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York, NY: Abrams Press. ISBN 978-1-4197-2907-2.

Criado Pérez, C. (2021). La mujer invisible: Descubre cómo los datos configuran un mundo por y para los hombres (ed. ePub). Titivillus. https://www.corporaciongilbertoecheverri.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/La-mujer-invisible-Caroline-Criado-Perez.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Lidia Natalia Trusilewicz (Autor/a)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...